Skip to content

References and competence areas in process optimisation

Instead of invented case studies, we show what we actually do: competence areas, typical scenarios from mid-sized companies and how we run a project. Specific results and matching references are discussed in person.

Analysis, delivery, operations Sector-agnostic for mid-sized firms One named contact in Söhlde

50+

delivered projects (project experience)

10

service areas from analysis to operations

6

sector focuses (project experience)

since 2013

experience in systems integration (project experience)

We do not publish client names or embellished case studies. What we can show is the craft itself: process analysis, automation of repetitive work, interfaces between systems, data integration and the ongoing operations that follow. This page sets out our competence areas, typical scenarios from trades, manufacturing, wholesale, logistics and administration, our project approach and the technology we work with. Which of those projects relate to your situation is something we place in a conversation.

Operating terminal at a machine tool in a production hall

Four patterns that show up in almost every project

Fields of competence · what we meet in mid-sized companies
Four patterns and the matching measure
Companies differ in size, sector and software. The bottlenecks look alike — and so do the measures that resolve them.
Pattern 1
Media break
Print it out, annotate it by hand, then type it in again.
Measure: interface
Pattern 2
Duplicate data entry
The same address sits in two systems, neither of them leads.
Measure: leading system per field
Pattern 3
Waiting at the handover
The case sits until someone notices it and passes it on.
Measure: automation with notification
Pattern 4
Reporting by hand
Figures are copied together from several systems every month.
Measure: connect the key figures
Which pattern costs the most in your own company decides the order of implementation.no client names
Project experience50+ projects delivered
Entry pointProcess analysis from 1,900 € net
Illustrative view of recurring bottlenecks from project experience — no client names and no promised results.

Our competence areas

Companies differ in size, sector and software, yet the bottlenecks look alike: data is captured several times over, paper and files sit beside the systems, and reports are assembled by hand. The following nine areas cover the path from stocktaking to stable operations. In most projects several of them interlock, because automation rarely holds up without a clean data basis underneath it.

Process analysis

Recording the workflow along the actual work: who captures what, where media breaks occur, which steps repeat. The result is a written report with prioritised measures. Learn more

Process automation

Technology takes over repetitive work: pulling in documents, setting statuses, triggering notifications, producing lists. Approvals and exceptions stay in human hands. Learn more

Interfaces

Connecting systems via REST interfaces, webhooks, middleware or file exchange, depending on what the existing software offers. With retry logic and a full log. Learn more

Data integration

Isolated tools, grown lists and spreadsheets are merged into one data basis. Duplicates cleaned up, data ownership settled per field, reconciliation documented. Learn more

Document digitisation

Paper and PDF archives become searchable and linked to the case: order, delivery note, invoice and proof sit in one place instead of four folders. Learn more

Metrics and reporting

Figures from your existing systems are brought together and kept up to date, instead of being collected by hand each month. Reports with traceable origin. Learn more

Legacy replacement

Step-by-step migration rather than a single cut-off date: take over the data, secure parallel operation, switch function by function and keep the old state as a fallback. Learn more

Process documentation

Workflows written down so that cover arrangements, onboarding and audits work without follow-up questions. Written to be read, not filed away. Learn more

Operations and rollout

After go-live, monitoring, error handling and adaptation to software updates continue, complemented by rollout and training within the team. Operations and training

Typical scenarios in mid-sized companies

Around 99 per cent (Federal Statistical Office of Germany) of companies in Germany are small and medium-sized enterprises. Their workflows have grown over years, often around one industry-specific application, supplemented by lists, forms and mailboxes. The four scenarios below describe starting points we meet regularly in projects, together with the question that needs answering before any technology is chosen.

Scenario 1: the same data is captured several times

An order arrives in a mailbox, is created in the industry-specific application, copied into a list for scheduling and prepared once more for accounting at month end. Every transfer costs time and creates discrepancies between the versions. In the analysis we first settle which system is authoritative for which field. Only then does the connection follow: an interface where the software offers one, a governed file exchange where it does not. After the change, data is captured once and every other version follows automatically.

Scenario 2: paper and files sit beside the case

Delivery notes arrive as photos from the van, test certificates as PDFs by email, timesheets on paper from the workshop. Later, people search through folders, mailboxes and drives. We link the archive to the case: incoming documents are recognised, assigned to the order or the customer and filed in a searchable way, including retention periods. The side effect usually matters more than the search function: queries from accounting and customer service can be answered without pulling colleagues away from their work.

Scenario 3: figures only appear at month end

Utilisation, outstanding items, material consumption and contribution margins sit in different systems. Anyone who wants the current picture waits for a report that somebody assembles by hand. We bring the required values together, put the calculation in writing and refresh it automatically. The definition behind it matters more than the dashboard: if two departments calculate differently, no chart will help. That is why the work starts with a metric definition both sides support.

Scenario 4: a legacy system no longer holds up but must not fail

An older application keeps the business running but is no longer developed, has no interfaces and runs on hardware for which spares are hard to find. Switching overnight is risky in that position. We replace such systems in stages: secure and take over the data, build an intermediate layer for the data exchange, move functions across one after another and keep the old state available for reading during the transition. Operations continue throughout, and each stage is signed off on its own.

Which scenario comes closest to your company?

How we run a project

Around 30 minutes, free of charge: we establish which systems are in use, where work is duplicated and what bothers you most. Afterwards we say openly whether we are a fit and which step is worth taking first.

The technology we work with

REST interfaces and webhooks

Connections to documented programming interfaces, event-driven handovers via webhook, access protection through tokens and traceable logging of every call.

Middleware and queues

An intermediate layer decouples the systems: jobs are held in queues, retried after faults and processed in the correct business order, rather than being wired point to point.

Databases and data models

Relational databases for the shared data basis, cleanly modelled master data, history for changes and reconciliation runs that surface discrepancies instead of overwriting them.

File import and export

Where software offers no interface, we use governed file exchange: CSV, XML, JSON or sector formats, with validation rules, quarantine for faulty records and a resume point.

Inventory systems and accounting

Handover of documents, payments and master data between inventory management, accounting and the tax firm, including structured invoice formats for electronic document exchange.

Operations and monitoring

Automatic checks that transfers are running, notification on failures, retention of logs and regular review of runtimes and error rates. Hosting and data in Germany.

Sectors we have worked in

Trades and crafts

Orders, scheduling, material withdrawal and time recording belong together. We connect site, office and accounting so that paper slips and re-entry disappear.

Manufacturing

Bills of material, production orders, feedback from the shop floor and stock levels. The aim is one continuous state from purchase order to dispatch without interim lists.

Service providers

Quote, project, service recording and invoicing in one chain. A frequent case: time recording that does not match invoicing, and variations that get lost along the way.

Wholesale

Keeping item data, prices, volume tiers and stock consistent across several channels. For trade with an online shop focus, we work alongside a dedicated sister offering.

Logistics

Shipment data, status messages, route planning and proof of delivery. Interfaces to clients and carriers, including file formats that have to be processed reliably every day.

Administration

Application, review, decision and filing as one continuous case. Traceability, deadlines and retention rank alongside the time saved, not below it.

Anonymised project outlines

What typical projects look like

Trades business
Starting point
Orders were taken in a mailbox, created in the industry application and captured again for invoicing.
Measure
Authoritative system settled per field, order and time data handed over through an interface, documents linked to the case.
Result
Capture in one place, invoicing without re-entry, queries answered without searching folders.
Manufacturer
Starting point
Stock levels and production states were maintained in several parallel lists, and discrepancies only surfaced at stocktaking.
Measure
Shared data basis built, shop floor feedback taken over automatically, reconciliation run with a discrepancy report set up.
Result
One stock figure for everyone involved, discrepancies visible the same day instead of at year end.
Service provider
Starting point
Metrics on utilisation and outstanding items were assembled by hand from several systems each month.
Measure
Metrics defined in writing, data sources connected, reporting refreshed automatically and moved to a weekly rhythm.
Result
Current figures without manual input, one consistent calculation across departmental boundaries.

Anonymised, generalised project outlines (project experience). No client names, no promised savings. Results depend on the starting point and the systems involved.

How to recognise process work that holds up

AspectTool firstOur approach
Starting pointSoftware is selected, the workflow adapts to itThe workflow is recorded, then the technology decision follows
Data ownershipLeft open, every system writes as wellSettled in writing per field before any connection is built
Failure caseTransfers break off silentlyRetry, follow-up queue and notification are part of the build
Knowledge in the companySits in the heads of a few peopleProcess documentation and rollout are part of the project scope
After go-liveThe project ends at handoverMonitoring, update checks and evolution during live operation

Specific results on request

We have agreed confidentiality for our projects. That is why there are no client names here, no before-and-after figures and no embellished case studies. In a personal conversation we place your project and show you comparable work from your sector, as far as our clients have approved it. Get in touch and describe your system landscape briefly.

Starting the collaboration

from 1,900 € net plus VAT
  • Stocktaking along the actual work
  • Written report with an effort estimate per measure
  • Fixed-price quote per delivery step, decided one at a time

Process analysis as the entry point: stocktaking of your workflows, a written report and prioritised measures. Delivery per automation or interface from 4,900 € net plus VAT at a fixed price after the analysis. Ongoing support from 190 € net plus VAT per month.

Prices as of September 2026. Ongoing services are booked individually and can be cancelled monthly; there is no minimum term.

What can we help you with?

One click is enough — everything after that is optional.

Tell us briefly about the project

Everything on this step is optional.

When would you like to start? (optional)
Rough budget range (optional)

Optional — you are not committing to anything.

How can we reach you?

We usually get back to you within one business day.

By submitting you consent to the processing of your details to handle this request. Details in our privacy policy.