Skip to content

Digitise your documents instead of searching folders

We turn paper filing and scattered PDF folders into searchable documents attached to the right case: capture, text recognition, indexing, access rights, retention periods and a deletion policy that fits the legal requirements.

Process analysis from 1,900 € net Implementation at a fixed price after the analysis GoBD requirements considered from the start

since 2013

experience with business IT

50+

completed projects (project experience)

8 years

retention for accounting vouchers (German Fiscal Code)

2-6 weeks

typical duration per stage (project experience)

Entry point and implementation · net plus VAT

from 1,900 € process analysis as the entry point
  • First survey how documents actually move, then build
  • Fixed price per stage instead of an open-ended estimate
  • Retention periods, access rights and deletion policy are part of the scope
  • Operation, adjustments and a named contact well beyond the rollout

The process analysis starts at 1,900 € net and covers a survey of how documents move through your business, a written report and a prioritised list of measures. Implementation per stage starts at 4,900 € net as a fixed price set after the analysis. Ongoing support starts at 190 € net per month. All prices are net plus VAT; third-party licences and fees are shown separately. The full breakdown is on the pricing overview.

Prices as of September 2026. Ongoing services are booked individually and can be cancelled monthly; there is no minimum term.

In many mid-sized businesses, documents live in three worlds at once: as paper in a binder, as a file on a network drive and as an attachment in an individual mailbox. Anyone looking for a delivery note, a test report or an order confirmation therefore looks in three places — and often finds a version nobody can confirm is the current one. To us, digitising documents does not mean replacing paper with PDF. It means making every document part of the case it belongs to, and expressing the rules for access, retention and deletion in the system rather than in a written work instruction. The starting point for that is the process analysis.

Row of uniform ring binders on an office shelf

One document as it is filed after digitisation

Example document in the archiveDelivery note · case A-2026-0148
filed unalterably
CaptureScanned at goods receipt12 March 2026, same day
Text recognitionFull text searchableExtraction template for this type
Retentionuntil 31 Dec 2034Deadline on the document, not the folder
Indexing
Document typeDelivery note
CaseOrder A-2026-0148
SupplierCreditor 4021
Document date12 March 2026
AccessRole purchasing, role accounting
Checklist per document type
Text recognition verified
Assigned to the case
Permissions by role, not by person
Deletion proposal once the period ends
Opened from the case instead of searched in a folder — that is what indexing is for.access log kept
Implementation per stagefrom 4,900 € net, fixed
Accounting records (German Fiscal Code)8 years of retention
Illustrative view of a filed document — document type, retention period and permissions follow your filing rules.

How to tell that your filing is slowing you down

The cost of disorganised filing rarely shows up as one large item. It is spread across many small searches, follow-up questions and reprints that nobody records during the working day. It becomes visible where documents leave or enter the business: at handover to accounting, during a complaint, during an external audit. That is where we begin the survey, because there you can measure how often a document is searched for, copied or requested again. The following points come up in virtually every project.

  • Documents are searched for rather than opened from within the case
  • The same file sits in several folders, sometimes in different versions
  • Scanned PDFs are images without text and therefore not searchable
  • File names carry the structure instead of the system — and everyone names differently
  • Access rights depend on folder structures that have grown over years
  • Nobody can say which records may or must be deleted, and when

What makes a document genuinely digitised

Capture

Paper is captured at a defined point: via the existing network scanner, via a multifunction device with a feeder, or via a collection folder where files from mailboxes and specialist software are dropped. Digitally arriving documents take the same route.

Text recognition

The image becomes searchable text. The recognised text sits as an invisible layer over the original, so the appearance stays unchanged while every word can still be found in a full-text search.

Indexing

Document date, document type, number, sender and amount are read out and stored as structured fields. Anything that cannot be read with confidence is flagged for review instead of quietly guessed.

Linked to the case

The document belongs to the order, the project, the customer or the asset — not to a folder beside it. Whoever opens the case sees every related record without needing to know where it is stored.

Access rights

Who may view, change or export which records follows from their role in the business. Personnel files and commercial records live in the same system but not in the same visible area.

Retention and deletion

Every document carries its retention period and the point from which deletion becomes possible or required. The system proposes; the decision stays with your team.

From capture to finding it again

We follow the route of your most important document types: where does the document originate, who receives it, where is it filed, who looks for it later? Along the way we record volumes, existing devices and the systems in which the related cases are managed. The result is a list of document types, ranked by effort and benefit.

The difference: storage location or case context

Most failed document projects fail not on the technology but on folder logic. Copying a paper archive one to one into directories leaves you with the same structure as before — just without the shelving. The benefit only appears when the document is reachable from within the case and the storage location becomes a side issue.

  • Search by content and attributes instead of directory paths
  • One document, several contexts: order, customer, asset, period
  • New staff find records without knowing the structure that grew over years
  • Folder structures may change without breaking references
Before: storage location
Projects › 2026 › Customers › M › Order 4711 › Scan_final_v2.pdf
Only findable by those who know the structure that grew
one path, one context
VS
After: case context
Delivery note 4711
Order 4711CustomerAsset 12Week 31
one document, four contexts
Searched by attribute, not by path
Search entry pointMatches
Order 47119 documents
Asset 12 · maintenance 20264 documents
Folder renamed — references stay validno dead paths

Retention periods and GoBD requirements

As soon as records are kept digitally, the same regulatory requirements apply as for paper — only implemented differently. The German Fiscal Code sets retention at ten years (German Fiscal Code) for books, records and annual financial statements, eight years (German Fiscal Code) for accounting vouchers and invoices, and six years (German Fiscal Code) for received commercial and business letters. The GoBD, the German principles for the proper keeping and retention of books in electronic form, additionally describe how these records must be handled: traceable, complete, timely, orderly and unalterable. For implementation this mainly means that the requirements have to be held in the system, not in the memory of individual people. We express the four central points technically and record them in the process documentation, which is part of the project scope.

Unalterability

A record that has been filed is not overwritten. Corrections are created as a new version linked to the original, so the earlier state is preserved and the change stays visible.

Traceability

The system logs who filed, changed, exported or marked a document as deletable, and when. That log can be evaluated without needing database access.

Procedural documentation

Capture route, review steps, responsibilities and the technology in use are recorded in writing. During an audit, this documentation is the evidence that the process runs the way it is described.

Retention on the document

The retention period follows from the document type and is set when the record is created. That makes it possible to evaluate which records are still subject to retention and which are due for deletion.

Technical implementation, not legal or tax advice

We implement the requirements technically and document the process so it can be followed. The tax and legal assessment of your records stays with your tax adviser or legal adviser. In practice we agree the structure with them before implementation — which saves rework later.

Access rights and the deletion policy

Digital filing makes records easier to find — for everyone with access. That is why assigning rights belongs in the same project and not in a later stage. We work with roles rather than personal permissions: a role describes what a function in the business may see and do, and people are assigned to roles. When a responsibility changes, one assignment changes instead of a long list of individual folder permissions. The deletion policy is the counterpart: the General Data Protection Regulation requires that personal data is not kept longer than necessary, while the German Fiscal Code prescribes a minimum retention for certain records. Meeting both at once only works if document types are cleanly distinguished.

  • Roles instead of individual personal permissions, documented and traceable
  • Separate visible areas for personnel files and commercial records
  • Retention counted per document type, not applied flatly across everything
  • Deletion proposals with an approval step instead of automatic final deletion
  • A log of completed deletions as evidence
  • Export and disclosure capability for data subject requests

Not sure where your filing costs the most time?

Three ways to handle paper

Paper filing, plain scanning or linked documents

Not every business needs the same depth. What changes day to day depends less on the device than on whether the document is attached to the case.

No project

Paper stays paper

  • Included: No changeover, no rollout cost
  • Included: A familiar routine for long-serving staff
  • Not included: Searching takes time, especially during queries and complaints
  • Not included: Records are only available where the binder physically sits
  • Not included: Retention and deletion are tracked by hand
Halfway

Scanning without a structure

  • Included: Quick to set up, often with existing devices
  • Included: Records are available outside the archive room as well
  • Not included: Without text recognition the PDF stays an unsearchable image
  • Not included: The folder structure simply repeats the old filing digitally
  • Not included: Rights and retention remain tied to directories that grew over years
Our approach

Linked documents

  • Included: Full-text search across the whole stock instead of path knowledge
  • Included: The document is attached to the order, customer, project or asset
  • Included: Rights via roles, retention and deletion rules per document type
  • Included: Fixed price per stage after the process analysis
  • Not included: Requires agreeing document types and mandatory fields up front

Text recognition and the limits of automation

Text recognition converts the image of a document into machine-readable text. On cleanly printed records this works reliably; on poor copies, stamps across figures, handwritten notes or faxed originals the hit rate drops. We therefore do not assume that every field is filled correctly by itself. Instead we build the process so that uncertain values stand out: whatever the system could not read unambiguously lands in a short review list rather than going unchecked into a data field.

For recurring document types from the same sender, an extraction template pays off. It describes which detail sits where on the document and therefore delivers more stable results than general recognition. In practice a handful of templates covers most of the incoming volume, because senders and forms rarely change. Where invoices already arrive as a machine-readable data set, extraction becomes unnecessary and the data flows onward via data integration. The real time saving appears where the recognised document becomes a work step: an incoming record creates a review task, a signed delivery note closes an order step, a test report sets the next due date. We describe that part under process automation, and the evaluation of the resulting data under metrics and reporting.

Involving existing systems instead of replacing them

Many businesses already run software in which documents could be filed — in the inventory system, in industry-specific software or in project administration. Before we introduce an additional archive, we check what those systems provide. Often the function is not missing, only the configuration: document types are not maintained, text recognition is not switched on, or the link to the case was never established. Configuring an existing solution properly is usually faster and cheaper than operating an additional system. Where a legacy system cannot meet the requirements, we plan its replacement in steps rather than as a single cut-over date — described under legacy replacement. In both cases the data stays exportable, and the structure of the archive is documented so that a later change remains possible. Operation and data storage take place on servers in Germany.

What digitising your documents costs

Pricing for digitising your documents

The effort depends on the number of document types, the volume of incoming items and how deeply the existing stock is taken over. That is why the analysis comes before the quote. All prices are net plus VAT.

Process analysis

A survey of how documents move through your business as the basis for any implementation.

from 1,900 € one-off net
  • Survey of the main document types and their routes
  • Volumes, existing devices and the software involved
  • Assessment of retention periods and access rights
  • Written report with a prioritised list of measures
  • Fixed-price quote for the recommended stages
Request the analysis
Most common scope

Implementation per stage

One completed stage, for example the entire incoming document flow.

from 4,900 € fixed price net
  • Capture routes and text recognition set up
  • Document types, mandatory fields and extraction templates defined
  • Link to the leading specialist system via interface or import
  • Roles, rights and retention periods stored per document type
  • Procedural documentation and staff briefing
Discuss the scope

Ongoing support

Operation and further development after the rollout.

from 190 € per month net
  • Monitoring of the capture and processing chain
  • Refining extraction templates when new forms appear
  • Adding further document types and adjusting rights
  • Support for the annual retention and deletion runs
  • A named contact for questions from your team
Discuss support

All prices net plus VAT. Third-party licence and fee elements are shown separately from the fixed price. The binding price for implementation is set after the process analysis.

Typical starting points from projects

Incoming documents
Starting point
Incoming invoices arrive by post and by email; the two routes are handled separately, and queries drag on because nobody knows which record has already been checked.
Measure
One shared intake route with text recognition, extraction templates for the most frequent senders and a review step per record.
Result
The processing status is visible on the record, and handover to accounting comes from one stock instead of two.
Site paperwork
Starting point
Delivery notes and timesheets arrive as photos taken on a mobile phone and are retyped in the evening; the link to the order is made from memory.
Measure
Capture directly against the order, with automatic text recognition and a mandatory field for the order number.
Result
The records hang on the right order, and invoicing works from the same stock as site management.
Retention
Starting point
An archive room is full, but nobody can say which records are still subject to retention and which may be deleted.
Measure
Assign retention periods per document type, evaluate the digital stock, introduce deletion proposals with an approval step.
Result
The annual retention run becomes an evaluation with an approval step instead of an estimate in the archive room.

Illustrative scenarios from typical project runs (project experience), anonymised and without client details.

Frequently asked questions about document digitisation

What can we help you with?

One click is enough — everything after that is optional.

Tell us briefly about the project

Everything on this step is optional.

When would you like to start? (optional)
Rough budget range (optional)

Optional — you are not committing to anything.

How can we reach you?

We usually get back to you within one business day.

By submitting you consent to the processing of your details to handle this request. Details in our privacy policy.